12 November 2010

Chevrolet uses IBM's Rational platform for the new Volt Vehicle

Chevy Volt Conceptphoto © 2007 Neal | more info(via: Wylio)According to a report at TechCrunch, US car maker Chevrolet has been using IBM's Rational platform during the development of the new Chevy Volt.

As explained in Monday’s press release, GM used IBM’s suite of Rational software products (which includes design and simulation tools) “to develop some of the Volt’s critical electronic controls for the vehicle’s innovative battery system, electric drive unit, and cabin electronics.” According to LeBlanc, IBM’s software allowed disparate engineering teams to collaborate, put products to the test and it helped them model and better understand how various electronic systems would interact.
That’s a significant departure from the past, when GM’s engineering teams would develop components independently, with minimal sharing during the development process.
First, kudos to Chevy for embracing a collaborative approach to design. The company has for too long been saddled with an overly hierarchical structure. Lets hope that this is just the first step towards a more effective development process for them. Also, kudos to IBM for making a very high profile software sale

While that quote is nice, it isn't the one that really caught my eye.

IBM and GM revealed new details on Monday on the car’s electronic backbone and how it came together in 29 months, from concept to finish.
29 months for a project from start to finish. Is that good or bad? Yes, it is less time than most complete new car designs for an auto manufacturer, but is it something to brag about or not? Two and a half years is still a very long time, especially while the company is going through a massive bankruptcy.

Two things that are not said in the article are 1) was 29 months ahead, on or behind schedule and 2) how did the project do against its projected budget? These are far more fascinating questions to me as they would tell us a lot about GM's ability to actually execute its plans.

How would you rate GM's progress as shown with the Volt?

6 comments:

  1. Ted, like most other PR spins, don't expect to get any real and meaningful information out of these guys. Most of the population has now become so accustomed to being drowned in irrelevant information, that it is now becoming increasingly more difficult to reach sensible conclusions given that it is never clear what is the level of objectivity that could/should be applied to the raw data on which it could be based. Having said that, kudo for tryin,g as if we give up we will surely forfeit our right for credible information.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, I am dreaming, I know. We will never find out the real story, but its nice to dream on occasion!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I heard Boeing used Doors and look what happenned there!

    Oh well, some things can't be helped by requirements management!

    ReplyDelete
  4. IBM did a magnificent job with the Chevy Volt. I read somewhere that it took 10 million lines of code to bring the hybrid car to where it is now.

    used car loans

    ReplyDelete
  5. That is true, Boyd. You know how amazing 10 million lines of code is? That's around 3 million more lines of code than it takes to make a modern fighter jet plane functional.

    car finance

    ReplyDelete
  6. "Ted, like most other PR spins, don't expect to get any real and meaningful information out of these guys." Talk about bad journalism. But then again, you can't expect bloggers to act like reputable journalists.

    ReplyDelete

Search This Blog