"My point was not the Gladwellian idea that rigorous and painstaking methods should give way to gut feelings or intuitive “blinks”. Rather, it was the certain kinds of rigorous and painstaking methods should not be applied by force in situations where qualitative deliberation is more appropriate."
Tim Van Gelder is a Melbourne blogger (among other things) that I have been following for a while. His comments above come from a recent post that leads n to a discussion about why simplistic application of analysis tools result is poor results.
Think about the "Three Options" joke that goes on in consulting gigs and project proposal phases. There is usually one clear and simple approach sandwiched between two obvious no starters. Why do we waste our time? Is there a better way?